Archive for the 'The region' Category

The path to collapse: China to step in (Full PDF available)?

ChinaThere has been speculation and I have speculated along with many others if the government should finally implode or explode. We do know the economy already collapsed a while ago, and the DPRK has been dependent on aid to keep the regime going. We also know it is hanging by a thread, and numerous reports from defectors and elsewhere has suggested the dire situation in North Korea. One of the speculations is once the regime is finally gone, who would take over, what plans are in place and the long term goals of the North if it should suddenly topple. One of the more well known speculations is China would step in. While not all agree with it, I think we can all agree China does have some vested interest in North Korea pre- and post-collapse. However, I do not have a crystal ball, so it is very hard to say what the future may bring. Whatever the case, sudden collapse will be painful and a mess. I cannot see it any other way.

Continue reading ‘The path to collapse: China to step in (Full PDF available)?’

Sphere: Related Content

Food woes in the DPRK (Resources included)

North Korea farmThis article got me thinking a lot, and the food shortages in North Korea seem to be getting worse and worse.

[...]

According to the survey results, which were announced Thursday, North Korea’s gross production of grains such as rice, corn and wheat, was about 4.01 million tons in 2007, down about 470,000 tons from the year before.

North Korea reportedly needs 6.5 million tons of grain to meet domestic demand, meaning it is facing a shortfall of about 2.49 million tons.

Especially devastating were torrential rains in August and a typhoon in September that hit the Korean Peninsula, which resulted in the flooding of about 11 percent of rice paddies in the country. As a result, rice production was 1.53 million tons, down by 360,000 tons from the previous year.

[...]

(Emphasis mine) North Korea’s food shortages are not new, and while I am not a farmer, I have read several places the land has been so overworked and the hills so stripped bare for fuel, the floods made the crops fare even worse. This article shows an eerie foretelling of the events of August 2007:

Photographs which depict a lush, rural environment are misleading. The country needs an average of 1m metric tonnes in food aid a year.

Yes, we have heard about the model farms before, but after the flooding, even some of the best crops were eradicated. Yes, in North Korea, image is everything, but it seems to me the facade is fading fast with the walls cracking and the real face showing behind it. The more that is shown, the bleaker it becomes. After a while, no amount of “spin” will make it better. In my mind, it is only a matter of time before everything is clear to everybody, and that will not be pretty for anybody.

“North Korea is not an agrarian country,” said Kathi Zellweger, a frequent visitor to the country with aid organisation Caritas. It is mostly rugged mountain terrain, and only about 18% is arable.

It is dependent on fertilizer and machinery to make that land productive, both of which are expensive.

Fertilizer and spare parts seem to be a very serious problem. With a growing population, the demand for more food rises (and you guessed it), the State cannot deliver when there is little to farm the land with. As the article goes on to suggest not only natural disasters takes its toll on food production, but decades of political central mismanagement of the Kims made things even worse (Among other things: see One Free Korea’s review of Marcus Noland and Stephen Haggard’s book on the famine - Markets, Aid and Reform as must read):

[...]

“If their farm produces five times as much, they don’t get five times as much food,” he said. Instead, they concentrate on their own private plots, which they use to feed themselves and to produce food for the markets.

The problem with this system is that market reforms, instituted in 2002, have sent prices soaring at a higher rate than wages. “Who can afford this stuff in the markets?” asked Mr French.

The answer: only the elite. Government officials, senior managers of state enterprises, security forces, and the leadership of the army are all unlikely to go hungry.

But a typical urban family can now only afford to buy 4kg of maize - the cheapest commodity - a month.

[...]

As Children of the Secret State suggested, the poor are only left with crumbs. The article only goes further to show a bleaker picture:

The urban diet is partly made up of a ration provided by the government, but this has dropped from 300-250g of cereals per person per day. North Korean officials have told the WFP they expect it to slump to 200g a day.

“The rural folk have already learned how to cope,” said Tim Peters, director of aid agency Helping Hands Korea. “But the urban people are so dependent on the government for distribution.”

As a result, foreign donations that have helped to prop North Korea up in previous years are doubly important this year.

To date, only 270,000 of the 500,000 tonnes of food needed for 2005 has arrived, the WFP says.

Then the prediction comes:

And there is always the risk of natural disaster.

Floods exacerbated the extreme food shortages 10 years ago, and North Korea’s ability to cope with them “is now probably worse”, said Mr French.

Ongoing land clearance has destroyed natural water breaks, “so it all just comes flooding down”.

…and that is precisely what happened with the major floods of August 2007. Then a little while later, a typhoon hits making the situation even worse. Not a lot has been said as to the result of the 2006 floods and how many people are perishing as a result of it, but the ROK did deliver tons and tons of food/medicine aid to the stricken North. If that helped, I am not sure of. However, one thing is clear. North Korea cannot continue to go on like this, and the people at some point are going to rebel especially if the food shortages hit the elite and/or KPA. It seems like it is happening already.

The DailyNK also paints the same shortfall with some reservations. What was the reservation?

[...]

A North Korean expert observed, “Due to the flood this year, the overall crop yield was reduced, but the products from North Korea’s paddy fields which are spread all over the place do not count in official statistics. When considering the food support from the outside world, the food shortage is not at a worrisome level.”

[...]

So this quote suggests the aid seems to be helping some, but I have to say this is still only a band-aid. I simply cannot see this level of suffering going on much longer without a lot of problems. However, I could be wrong, and have been wrong before. Also:

A majority of defectors insisted that the agricultural production level from North Korea’s individually cultivated lands (including paddy fields and fields attached to homes) will surpass the cooperative farms’ 30% standard.

So again, time will only tell, but along with the other news and rumors floating around including a lot of “firsts” for the reclusive regime tells me volumes. Something is changing in North Korea, and it may be bittersweet.

Also, see:

Country Studies

Food Security in North Korea: Designing Realistic Possibilities (PDF)

Famine and Reform in North Korea (PDF - Marcus Noland)

Hunger and Human Rights- The Politics of Famine in North Korea (PDF Haggard, Noland)

Edit: See One Free Korea

Sphere: Related Content

UN has concerns about human rights in North Korea (update)

North Korea can give a rat’s ass about the U.N., and the latest resolution is just a piece of paper to them. I can see Kim Jong Il laughing right now as he orders more innocent people to be sent to the gulags.

A U.N. General Assembly committee adopted a draft resolution Tuesday expressing “very serious concern” at persistent reports of widespread human rights violations in North Korea including torture, inhumane conditions of detention and public executions.

The assembly’s human rights committee approved the resolution by a vote of 97-23 with 60 abstentions, including South Korea. The draft now goes to the 192-member General Assembly for a final vote.

Why does this not surprise me?

The draft resolution, co-sponsored by more than 50 countries including the United States and many other Western nations, also expresses “very serious concern” at North Korea’s refusal to cooperate with the U.N.’s special investigator on human rights in the country.

Yes, that would cause some concern, but words do not do much for those getting publicly executed, living in substandard conditions, or getting tortured does it? Of course North Korea is not going to be cooperative with the U.N’s special investigator on human rights. This is as obvious as the nose on your face.

North Korea said it “categorically resents” the draft resolution which it said is “filled with fabrications” and “cannot be justified in any case” because it does not also condemn human rights violations committed by the countries co-sponsoring it.

Yes, of course it is all a lie. Those risking life to leave the country is just doing it for heck of it. It is fun to cross the river and play “dodge the bullets” or “bribe that guard”. The strongly worded resolution includes the following:

The draft cites North Korea’s “all-pervasive and severe restrictions on the freedoms of thought, conscience, religion, opinion and expression, peaceful assembly and association” by persecuting people exercising these rights and barring their freedom of movement and travel abroad.

It singles out “the persistence of continuing reports of systematic, widespread and grave violations of civil, political and economic, social and cultural rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea including torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, including inhuman conditions of detention, public executions, extrajudicial and arbitrary detention…”

Yes, pretty strong words. One question. Why are these concerns not expressed in the many talks with North Korea? The issue is completely ignored. They just do not want to get Kim mad. Instead, it is easier just to write a mad letter. What a waste of time.

Another surprise:

South Africa, Syria, Sudan, Venezuela, Libya and Egypt were among countries opposing the draft.

Alright, maybe not a huge surprise there. It does not really matter anyway. North Korea is going to simply brush this off, give the international hand gesture and continue business as usual. In the meantime, the coddling continues, the unchecked aid gets sent, the untold billions of dollars gets poured into the cooperative projects, and millions are sent to Kim to agree to meetings. He does not meet anybody without a price.

The draft resolution “strongly calls on” North Korea to urgently resolve the issue, an appeal reiterated by the Japanese who said Pyongyang should let abductees return to Japan and other countries they came from.

Kim Jong Il: “I am right on it!”

Continue reading ‘UN has concerns about human rights in North Korea (update)’

Sphere: Related Content

ReACH’s E-Mail: Abuction

dvdfinalcover3.jpgIn case readers do not get ReACH’s E-Mail, I got one regarding a potentially interesting documentary:

Dear Supporter of ABDUCTION,

November 15th marks 30 years since Megumi Yokota was kidnapped by North Korean spies. As many of you know, her family continues to try to get her back. To mark this important day, Safari Media is releasing, for the first time, the DVD of the film which includes never-before-seen footage, special features and bonus material. It also includes subtitles in 8 languages including English, Japanese, Spanish, Chinese, Korean, French and others. As a supporter of the film, we are letting you know about the release before the media or anyone else since supplies are limited. We hope you’ll tell your friends and family about the DVD and take advantage of this opportunity to share Megumi’s story with them.

To buy it now, go to www.abductionfilm.com

I would love to get this when I get more money, but you folks may be interested in checking it out.

Sphere: Related Content

Sakhalin Koreans

Exiled Koreans Return After 60 Years - Reading the story, it is pretty heartbreaking, and this is something I never heard about until now:

Starting in the 1920s, some 150,000 Koreans were brought 1,000 miles from Gyeongsangbuk province in Korea to the southern half of Sakhalin, off Siberia’s coast, then controlled by the Japanese. The province was chosen possibly to prevent the Koreans living near Japan from inundating the Japanese mainland to work.

The Koreans were pressed into coal mining, logging and construction. They worked in harsh conditions, amid the forests and mountains where brown bears roam and rivers teem with salmon.

After Japan lost World War II, the Soviet Union took over all of Sakhalin, including about 23,500 remaining Korean residents. Some of the Koreans had died in the war or from hard labor, while others had left.

Those still here were effectively stranded, since the Soviets had no diplomatic relations with what became South Korea, the U.S.-aligned country that was now home to their old province.

Sakhalin during the Soviet era was a “closed” border area, meaning outsiders needed special permission to enter. One of its many military bases housed the warplanes that in 1983 shot down Korean Air flight 007 for straying into Soviet airspace, killing all 269 people aboard.

In the 1950s and 1960s, the Soviets allowed communist North Korea to lure away several hundred of the Korean youth. Some of the brightest are believed to have gone, in the false hope they could get back to South Korea.

Sakhalin Koreans got a glimpse of their former homeland on television during the 1988 Seoul Olympics. Its broad highways and high-rise buildings amazed a people who had left the poor, agrarian peninsula, said Chi Bok I, an announcer for Sakhalin’s Korean-language TV station who returned to Korea in October.

Over time, many Sakhalin Koreans took Russian names — Pak called herself Masha — and tried to integrate into Soviet society. But they faced discrimination, with Moscow shuttering Korean-language schools in the 1960s. Only after the Soviet reforms known as perestroika in the 1980s were the Koreans allowed again to start learning their own language.

Today, some 30,000 Koreans live on Sakhalin, a harpoon-shaped island with an area roughly three-quarters that of South Korea but a population of only about 547,000. The Koreans include the descendants of the original group and some who came later from parts of the former Soviet Union and North Korea.

The Korean cultural presence is strong in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, the island’s capital city of more than 170,000 people, nestled in a valley backed by mountains. Markets feature kimchi — Korean pickled cabbage _and restaurants serve Korean cuisine.

About 2,000 of the estimated 3,000 elderly who qualify for repatriation are choosing to go home, according to the South Korean Foreign Ministry.

Since I did not know much about this area, I wen to Google to look it up, and reading it leads me to understand the hostility towards Japan. DPRK Studies has an article about the controversy surrounding the comfort women described in this overview of Sakhalin Korean Documentary (which I would like to see by the way):

A dark shadow cast by Japan and its responsibility for the continuing predicament of the Koreans of Sakhalin looms over the film. The overwhelming anger towards the former colonizer felt by the interviewees some fifty years after liberation is more than palpable, and the narration itself appears to endorse the view that blame for the ongoing sadness of these people lies with the Japanese. Although Japan’s forcible conscription of “comfort women” has begun to command international attention, the plight of the Sakhalin Koreans continues to go largely unnoticed, and the documentary can be seen as advocating that the Japanese should offer compensation for their wartime misdeeds.

Wikipedia Entry on this topic

I plan to research this more, and anybody that has further information, I would be grateful.

Sphere: Related Content

Have a look at the Cold War archives

Kim Il SungI have been wanting to do this for quite some time, and while I should be finishing the propaganda series, I thought this would be something I want to post instead. The Cold War lasted for many decades, and while it is considered over by many people, for Korea, the Cold War never ended. The division is still there, and Panmunjom is the most visible of the division of ideologies.

I went ahead and looked around for some interesting tidbits in the Cold War Archives and other places to gain a better understanding of the thought process of North Korea and the Korean War.

Not only does this archive cover Korea, it covers other countries as well, and has a host of declassified documents and exchanges with leaders. It is a very interesting read, and it would do the site an injustice to highlight just a few things.

Some other stuff:

Cold War Studies at Harvard University

National Security Archive

CIA

Declassified Korean War Documents

More Korean War documents at Kimsoft

Enjoy the archives. If you know of any other archives that may be of interest to readers, please let me know and I will make sure to add it to the resources.

Sphere: Related Content

More on the peace treaty question

lol, RohTwo pieces of news today. It is basically a rehash, but this may interest readers anyway. The first from Chosun Ilbo:

In an interview with Japan’s Asahi Shimbun newspaper, President Roh Moo-hyun said mutual trust had to be established before a peace treaty could be concluded with North Korea. “(The concerned parties) are supposed to make promises that each can trust, declare peace and an end to the war when those promises reach a trustworthy level, and afterwards conduct peace talks and nuclear dismantlement simultaneously, aren’t they?” Roh said. (emphasis mine)

Huh? That does not make a whole lot of sense. He said earlier disablement and eventual dismantling can take a long time. So is this implying the peace talks can take just as long? I simply do not understand the line of thinking here. There are doubts that a peace treaty can be done before Roh is gone according to the Korea Times:

Continue reading ‘More on the peace treaty question’

Sphere: Related Content

Nukes, Mt. Paekdu and peace treaties (Update)

Kind of interesting news today which includes opening sacred Mount Paekdu to visitors via direct flights:

The decision comes a month after only the second summit between leaders of the two Koreas, divided by a fortified border since the end of the 1950-53 Korean War.

The North’s state-run news agency KCNA said South Korea’s Hyundai Group had been granted the right to conduct package tours to Mt. Paektu from May 2008 using direct flights from Seoul.

Personally, I never, ever thought something like this would ever happen, and this caught me by surprise. On the other hand, a lot of changes are happening in North Korea, yet at the same time, nothing changes. The DPRK is such a strange oxymoron.

A top Hyundai official met North Korean leader Kim Jong-il in Pyongyang on Saturday, KCNA said.

At present, South Koreans can only visit the Chinese side of the 2,744 metre (9,000 feet) mountain, which Koreans consider sacred because they believe it is the place of their ancestral origin. The mountain is on the northern tip of the Korean peninsula.

…and of course the supposed birthplace of Kim Jong Il (Link and emphasis mine). This is just speculation on my part, but Kim looking elsewhere at different economic models (see Vietnam post), opening/planning special economic zones, and now opening places not previously opened to the outside world may be an inkling (and from my view obvious) of Kim’s need for more hard needed cash. Is this a foreshadow of more dire things to come? Is North Korea finally realizing the very serious problems it faces? That I cannot answer, but that trip to Vietnam and other globe-trotting has me wondering. As with everything in North Korea, I am not going to place any bets.

Continue reading ‘Nukes, Mt. Paekdu and peace treaties (Update)’

Sphere: Related Content

Kim Jong Il is slipping in the polls (updated)

Kim Jong Il needs to work harder because he is #2 as the worst for press freedom. Eritrea came in first. Honestly, I do not know how that country could be any worse, but it must be pretty bad to be ranked #1.

WASHINGTON, Oct. 16 (Yonhap) — North Korea narrowly escaped being branded the country with the least press freedom in the world, coming in second to last after Eritrea, an annual index released by the Paris-based Reporters Without Borders said Tuesday.

North Korea came in 168th among 169 nations that were judged on the level of media freedom in the country. Turkmenistan was just one notch above North Korea.

I? know? Turkmenistan? was pretty bad, but did not think it was that bad. So maybe Kim can celebrate. His placement on the most repressive of regimes is improving somewhat. Perhaps another mass game or a public execution. Who knows?

If you are interested in the report, here it is. Reporters? Without? Borders? gives? the? reason? why? Eritrea? came? in? dead? last:

“There is nothing surprising about this,” Reporters Without Borders said. “Even if we are not aware of all the press freedom violations in North Korea and Turkmenistan, which are second and third from last, Eritrea deserves to be at the bottom. The privately-owned press has been banished by the authoritarian President Issaias Afeworki and the few journalists who dare to criticise the regime are thrown in prison. We know that four of them have died in detention and we have every reason to fear that others will suffer the same fate.”

Hm, North Korea does the same thing, but I guess it makes some sense considering it is a little difficult to go into the gulags and ask around. In any case, those are the winners of the losers in freedom of the press. I am pretty sad to read about the state of the United States:

There were slightly fewer press freedom violations in the United States (48th) and blogger Josh Wolf was freed after 224 days in prison. But the detention of Al-Jazeera’s Sudanese cameraman, Sami Al-Haj, since 13 June 2002 at the military base of Guantanamo and the murder of Chauncey Bailey in Oakland in August mean the United States is still unable to join the lead group.

Those inceidents of the blogger I had no idea about, and as for the Gitmo detainees is a very, very controversial issue, and the United States is very divided on that. I personally do not know what to think of it because a lot of the things going on down there has not all been brought to light other than the propaganda blaring from both sides of the issue. I personally do not care for the idea, but when I say that, I am labled a terrorist sympathizer. I do not support terrorism, but I wonder what is really going on down there. Anyway, this is not a Gitmo debate, this is about freedom of the press.

It? seems? China? is? not? too? friendly? to? bloggers:

Government repression no longer ignores bloggers

The Internet is occupying more and more space in the breakdown of press freedom violations. Several countries fell in the ranking this year because of serious, repeated violations of the free flow of online news and information.

In Malaysia (124th), Thailand (135th), Vietnam (162nd) and Egypt (146th), for example, bloggers were arrested and news websites were closed or made inaccessible. “We are concerned about the increase in cases of online censorship,” Reporters Without Borders said. “More and more governments have realised that the Internet can play a key role in the fight for democracy and they are establishing new methods of censoring it. The governments of repressive countries are now targeting bloggers and online journalists as forcefully as journalists in the traditional media.”

At least 64 persons are currently imprisoned worldwide because of what they posted on the Internet. China? [rank? 163] maintains its leadership in this form of repression, with a total of 50 cyber-dissidents in prison. Eight are being held in Vietnam. A young man known as Kareem Amer was sentenced to four years in prison in Egypt for blog posts criticising the president and Islamist control of the country’s universities.

Pretty scary.? I am all for the freedom of the press without the fear of beatings, prison or repression. As North Korea sits near the very bottom of the barrel, it makes me pretty sad to see the United States at #48. It should be a shining example of freedom, but alas, it is not. Is the report biased? Do they not understand? I am not too sure, but it still makes me sad all the same.

South Korea and Chile are tied at #39, which is not all that great either.

All the same, Reporters Wihtout Boreders is not free from controversy either and is accused of bias. I do not know who runs Counterpunch, but it seems conservative circles do not care for them while the Wikipedia article tends to paint the American left as praising it. Since I do not depend on Wikipedia for accuracy, I am not going to hang my hat on the article. All I know Reporters Without Borders is not free from controversy is all I am trying to get at here.

Here is how Reporters Without Borders compiles this index. I’ll leave it up to the readers to decide if the list is fair or not.

Update:? see? ROK? Drop’s? take? on
this.? I? would? also? love? to? see? a? list? of? the? abuses? of? freedom? given? to? others.

See? NK? EconWatch?

Sphere: Related Content

Korean War peace treaty questions

UnificationThere has been a buzz about a possible end to the Korean War, and reading about it, there are some unanswered questions from my end anyway, and perhaps some readers can help me understand some of the background or a better understanding on this.

This article got me thinking:

With the leaders’ agreement short of naming the participants in the talks, controversy remains over which country among the four pertinent countries — South and North Korea, the United States and China — should be excluded if the talks involve three nations. As signatories of the armistice, the U.S. and North Korea must be part of the talks. China, the other part of the three-way armistice, claims it will also be part of the talks, but the South Korean government has said Seoul will be part of the dialogue on any occasion, partly because the summit agreement was reached between the two Koreas.

What I am not getting from this article is why only three nations would be allowed to participate in a possible peace treaty. Since the United States, South Korea, China and North Korea were all part of the Korean War, why would only three nations be involved in the process when all four want (or appears to want) to be part of it? Kim Yong Nam was not talking:

Continue reading ‘Korean War peace treaty questions’

Sphere: Related Content